Posts: 1,112
Threads: 195
Likes Received: 649 in 249 posts
Likes Given: 763
Joined: Nov 2014
Can we have a verb, similar to Say, Emote, LOOC, etcetera that is used for one's thoughts? Many people roleplay their thoughts, but some others (such as myself) experience such roleplay as interruptions to roleplay. For me personally, it breaks me out of character and instead puts me into the position of a reader, as opposed to an actor invested in a role.
Thought (or think) would always appear in the "talk" tab, but it would have a toggle to appear in the "all" tab.
Posts: 917
Threads: 145
Likes Received: 72 in 41 posts
Likes Given: 59
Joined: Nov 2014
I, personally, think that roleplaying thoughts is bad form and shouldn't be done. There is no way to react to them that isn't metagame, so it's pointless masturbatory writing.
Posts: 653
Threads: 107
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 1
Joined: Jun 2015
I'm more in the realm of mind that Sawrock is (crappy pun intended).
+1
Also Known As:
Exxy Izzy
Posts: 4,627
Threads: 747
Likes Received: 924 in 487 posts
Likes Given: 1,383
Joined: Sep 2015
I mean, if it comes with three options of toggling, it can satisfy everyone at once:
- Off: This is ignored, you can't read what you think, or others think.
- Dynamic: You can read your own thoughts, but others come as "X seems thoughtful for a second." Like when you're deaf and an emote replaces your words.
- On: Self-explanatory.
Posts: 7,354
Threads: 397
Likes Received: 533 in 243 posts
Likes Given: 10
Joined: Nov 2014
I agree with Megablues in the sense that it isn't really necessary or possible to react to.