Posts: 2,153
Threads: 567
Likes Received: 173 in 98 posts
Likes Given: 44
Joined: Nov 2014
Short and simple.
If your mainhand weapon does not have a potential (or if it is not unlocked), you should be able to use the potential of your offhand.
Having to sub-hand your weapon as an Arbalest that has a potential feels bad.
•
Posts: 190
Threads: 32
Likes Received: 109 in 47 posts
Likes Given: 174
Joined: Sep 2022
the roaring rose incident
066: Birth of the Robot Emperor
•
Posts: 1,153
Threads: 152
Likes Received: 634 in 337 posts
Likes Given: 674
Joined: Aug 2015
How can you utilize a weapon's full potential with your left hand though, it makes no sense lore wise. (I make joke)
What if it gave you off hand potential as long as main hand doesn't have a potential active?
•
Posts: 4,586
Threads: 741
Likes Received: 896 in 472 posts
Likes Given: 1,362
Joined: Sep 2015
Or we could have both potentials work regardless of the hand. They're an investment and a half anyway, and there's no incentive in using two weapons for potentials as is.
•