Posts: 1,058
Threads: 191
Likes Received: 609 in 222 posts
Likes Given: 673
Joined: Nov 2014
Can we have a verb, similar to Say, Emote, LOOC, etcetera that is used for one's thoughts? Many people roleplay their thoughts, but some others (such as myself) experience such roleplay as interruptions to roleplay. For me personally, it breaks me out of character and instead puts me into the position of a reader, as opposed to an actor invested in a role.
Thought (or think) would always appear in the "talk" tab, but it would have a toggle to appear in the "all" tab.
•
Posts: 911
Threads: 145
Likes Received: 68 in 38 posts
Likes Given: 51
Joined: Nov 2014
I, personally, think that roleplaying thoughts is bad form and shouldn't be done. There is no way to react to them that isn't metagame, so it's pointless masturbatory writing.
•
Posts: 653
Threads: 107
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 1
Joined: Jun 2015
I'm more in the realm of mind that Sawrock is (crappy pun intended).
+1
Also Known As:
Exxy Izzy
•
Posts: 4,552
Threads: 730
Likes Received: 890 in 467 posts
Likes Given: 1,353
Joined: Sep 2015
I mean, if it comes with three options of toggling, it can satisfy everyone at once:
- Off: This is ignored, you can't read what you think, or others think.
- Dynamic: You can read your own thoughts, but others come as "X seems thoughtful for a second." Like when you're deaf and an emote replaces your words.
- On: Self-explanatory.
•
Posts: 7,132
Threads: 391
Likes Received: 512 in 227 posts
Likes Given: 10
Joined: Nov 2014
I agree with Megablues in the sense that it isn't really necessary or possible to react to.
•