Posts: 1,128
Threads: 200
Likes Received: 673 in 257 posts
Likes Given: 810
Joined: Nov 2014
Can we have a verb, similar to Say, Emote, LOOC, etcetera that is used for one's thoughts? Many people roleplay their thoughts, but some others (such as myself) experience such roleplay as interruptions to roleplay. For me personally, it breaks me out of character and instead puts me into the position of a reader, as opposed to an actor invested in a role.
Thought (or think) would always appear in the "talk" tab, but it would have a toggle to appear in the "all" tab.
Posts: 919
Threads: 145
Likes Received: 72 in 41 posts
Likes Given: 63
Joined: Nov 2014
I, personally, think that roleplaying thoughts is bad form and shouldn't be done. There is no way to react to them that isn't metagame, so it's pointless masturbatory writing.
Posts: 653
Threads: 107
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 1
Joined: Jun 2015
I'm more in the realm of mind that Sawrock is (crappy pun intended).
+1
Also Known As:
Exxy Izzy
Posts: 4,741
Threads: 774
Likes Received: 959 in 514 posts
Likes Given: 1,425
Joined: Sep 2015
I mean, if it comes with three options of toggling, it can satisfy everyone at once:
- Off: This is ignored, you can't read what you think, or others think.
- Dynamic: You can read your own thoughts, but others come as "X seems thoughtful for a second." Like when you're deaf and an emote replaces your words.
- On: Self-explanatory.
what the heck!!!
im not part of the abc news
Posts: 7,643
Threads: 402
Likes Received: 628 in 310 posts
Likes Given: 21
Joined: Nov 2014
I agree with Megablues in the sense that it isn't really necessary or possible to react to.