Posts: 1,387
	Threads: 176
		Likes Received: 795 in 425 posts
Likes Given: 811
	Joined: Aug 2015
	
	
 
	
		
		
		11-07-2022, 09:44 PM 
(This post was last modified: 11-07-2022, 09:45 PM by Poruku.)
	
	 
	
		These weapons are cool in theory, however, they are useless as main weapons. If you attack with the bow, there is a % chance your attack will be entirely negated and replaced with a projectile that deals less damage. No on-hit effects proc, no crit, etc.
I think the proc should be an addition to the attack instead of replacing it
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 4,741
	Threads: 774
		Likes Received: 959 in 514 posts
Likes Given: 1,425
	Joined: Sep 2015
	
	
 
	
	
		What if the attack becomes an AoE basic hit that targets like Jackhammer does?
	
	
	
what the heck!!!
im not part of the abc news
![[Image: 21c5ffe850a83e858f2eed11d594fe17.jpg]](https://i.pinimg.com/736x/21/c5/ff/21c5ffe850a83e858f2eed11d594fe17.jpg) 
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 2,139
	Threads: 277
		Likes Received: 244 in 138 posts
Likes Given: 93
	Joined: Nov 2014
	
	
 
	
	
		 (11-07-2022, 09:44 PM)Poruku Wrote:  These weapons are cool in theory, however, they are useless as main weapons. If you attack with the bow, there is a % chance your attack will be entirely negated and replaced with a projectile that deals less damage. No on-hit effects proc, no crit, etc.
I think the proc should be an addition to the attack instead of replacing it
Or each bow gets a "grants skill" of the projectile with good scaling
150% ele attack +100% swa
	
 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	;) 
	
	
		
	Posts: 298
	Threads: 54
		Likes Received: 263 in 110 posts
Likes Given: 213
	Joined: Aug 2022
	
	
 
	
	
		Considering the recent changes, I think this should be re-looked at.
They're still completely unusable which is sad. Can we make it not unusable?
Polk's idea is a good one.
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,442
	Threads: 278
		Likes Received: 348 in 194 posts
Likes Given: 500
	Joined: Dec 2014
	
	
 
	
	
		It certainly has been like that for a whole while, proccing an effect shouldn't give you a "damm it!" feeling. But for reasons that Polk has stated, its usually better to have a basic effect free attack with that weapon.
so +1 for a change of it
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	;) 
	
	
		
	Posts: 637
	Threads: 142
		Likes Received: 84 in 59 posts
Likes Given: 304
	Joined: Jun 2016
	
	
 
	
	
		The projectile should just be made to be able to crit.
Now that Dev has made that a thing with Hisen's potential and ranger's twin shot, we know its possible.
The only reason the damage is worse, is due to its inability to crit. The element might also not be the best, but that's whatever, really. It'd at least make the weapon usable.
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,442
	Threads: 278
		Likes Received: 348 in 194 posts
Likes Given: 500
	Joined: Dec 2014
	
	
 
	
	
		One of the main reasons is, because you lose the momentum game that you usually have with it, as as a basic attack archer you pretty much want the bonus momentum usually. Of course not all ranger run Fleur, but it is a pretty good thing to run with it.
So personally prefer it being some bonus damage instead, just so it won't interfere with momentum risk-reward management.