[Balor]

If we are going to cut out the pretense and rhetoric then this entire thread is meant to challenge a ban by hitting the easiest point of the ban to challenge being the point of consent to an injury.  

Blatantly ignoring the major points that likely actually led to the ban, and actively had been warned prior.  I am not going to sit and pretend that a conversation was ever meant to be had when this thread was put up. Folks wanted to protest the punishment of a friend, and while that is understandable and even commendable.  

Critical thinking was lost somewhere down the line.  Feel free to disagree with me, feel free to dislike me for my perspective. But feel free to tell me, when I am telling lies.