[Kameron8]

I admit though that I too feel that many of the concerns you have stated, I have felt for many many years now. Espically the "First to speak up, wins!" thing about speaking up to admins, is extra true, cause even if we assume the Admins do what they can to find the truth, the narrative is ultimately directed by those very few people that speak up, allowing them to Weaponize the Admins in a way and can even fake evidence. Since there is Zero transparency between that and the people being accused, they suddenly have to fight a defense war against unseen threats. Stuff plucked out of context? Faked Evidence? Blown entirely out of proportion or even omiting their own shortcomings to paint themselves in a better light and justify it?

The accused doesn't see any of that, and need to grasp for air, as the one accuser who might have malicious intents sees the whole gameboard. This? Needs to change. The transparency system as it stands, or lack of it, makes weaponizing admins easy. 

I share this concern, even if I don't agree with greenlighting every report made for public viewing.  Obviously retaliation is (and has been in the past) a pretty big problem.  However, if evidence takes the form of things like Discord screenshots, or copy and pasted SL2 logs, both are laughably easy to lie about and only Dev can verify one of those two things to begin with.

I am not implying this has happened, but I agree outright that it is not only possible, but trivial to weaponize admins if the accused is left fully in the dark.  And if it has not happened, it will eventually happen with the current system.

With regard to the original post, I hope to see you again in the future Anhita, and it was fun.