Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[Kind Of NSFW?] Banned for linking to explicit aboriculture?
#1
Ban Material :
[Image: Oihq5_233-YBp6KTIDXFLdE8pLMwY8agHM7LJXDQ...MWWpk=s127]
-Story-
I was in ooc.
Someone was entering kaio-ken at the thought of someone touching their trees.
I chimed in such ramblings.
I remember link to something I saw five years ago.
Post link in ooc captioned RULE 34 TREES.
Apparently, The link itself wasn't explanatory-
As Dyst stoicly rode up on a white stalion, Dropping 259 thousand 200 second ban upon thee -
A link with the title - Rule 34 Trees somehow needed a spoiler that it was in fact Rule 34 Trees~
-Story-
Armurhan -IGN
Sigrogana Legend 2 - Game
Posting "Sexually explicit material" in ooc. / Not warning the link was explanatory
259K seconds / 72 Hours.
I think Dyst- Sarin is my source, though.

Now, I wasn't going to post this initially. But after little persuasion, I ended up typing this two days into the ban from being told numerous times that it wasnt That explicit, And that banning for what is a very unlikely tree development- Was madness.
I would like clarification if what I posted was truly worth 3 days or not, As Ive now became skeptical of its severity, being only mildly sexual in nature. I accept the ban even if this is a somewhat petty thing to be banned for -
Armurhan


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
Sigrogana Legend 2 Discord