[Nanovelich]

Eh, figured that'd be taken the wrong way.

My intent was not to speak against this idea. I'm for it, but I don't feel like it's something that should have to be... justified, or debated? It was less targeted at the original suggestion and more as a remark to this:

While it does help out min-maxers, its not like not doing something like this will stop them.

It won't make a difference, at all. It's just so arbitrary a thing that it's both not worth objecting to by anyone but also not worth having to make a case for.

So I mean, if you want my official stance: +1 to OP, but we shouldn't even be bothering to keep count is what I'm saying.

I would be much more enthusiastic about this idea if the stat predictions when adjusting points didn't change all willy-nilly sometimes. Maybe I'm missing a pattern to it, but I end up disregarding anything I actually see on that screen until I hit Accept.

Perhaps this is a bit of ignorance on my part, like equipment stat boosts not being shown while adjusting points or something, but without that reliability for stat adjusting and only having the scaled stat view for a glance that's much less informative than the Battle Information's scaled stat preview that appropriately scales to new conditions that would change your scaled stat in battle, I'm quite passive about it.

And if that is the case, could we get that window to uh... not do that? It just looks very concerning when you see decreases in your attributes because of it.

Regardless, I apologize if either of these posts leave a bad impression.