08-16-2016, 09:40 PM
"Nuclear" Wrote:http://puu.sh/qDJZX/59e7fe9ed4.webm
I'll leave this here for the few who believe that the logs shared were somehow tampered with or falsified. As for Cerrik, there were many attempts to keep this private (several players asking in civil manner to reveal the truth; She denied each of them and said she'd 'let things unfold as they do.' ) until I was forced to share them as evidence with Chaos. When he decided that they were inconsequential to his decision, that is when I shared it and the entirety of my conversation with him with others to gain the momentum needed (along with Egil's provided logs which shed additional light) to make this a reality.
Even if my choice of words are 'appalling' and I completely disagree with them being shared, I'm not particularly upset at you for sharing them. I see the logic behind it and I can't argue with it. In my shoes, I would not have shared them but I don't hold people to my rules, either. Unfortunately, the discredit doesn't come from you sharing the logs, it's the way a handful of people handled it once they obtained those logs.